Skip to content

Evaluate annotations before completing tree of definitions #1249

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 23, 2016

Conversation

odersky
Copy link
Contributor

@odersky odersky commented May 10, 2016

Motive: That way we can identify annotation macros without special
name resolution rules.

This was surprisingly easy.

Review by @xeno-by

odersky added 3 commits May 10, 2016 23:28
Motive: That way we can identify annotation macros without special
name resolution rules.

This was surprisingly easy.
... relative to CollectionStrawman1.
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ import annotation.tailrec
* strengths and weaknesses of different collection architectures.
*
* For a test file, see tests/run/CollectionTests.scala.
*
* Strawman4 is like strawman1, but built over views instead of by-name iterators
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this commit here intentionally?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, I just threw it in to save time.

@xeno-by
Copy link

xeno-by commented May 14, 2016

I'll take a look on Mon/Tue 16/17 May after my arrival back to Europe. Looking forward to understanding better how Dotty works!

@odersky odersky merged commit cec6467 into scala:master May 23, 2016
OlivierBlanvillain pushed a commit to OlivierBlanvillain/dotty that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2016
OlivierBlanvillain pushed a commit to OlivierBlanvillain/dotty that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2016
@allanrenucci allanrenucci deleted the change-early-annots branch December 14, 2017 16:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants